888 Hit with £7.8 Million Fine After Self Exclusion Issues

The UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) takes the ability for vulnerable gamblers to exclude themselves from online and land based casinos very seriously, as this has been proven by a £7.8 million penalty that has been charged to 888 after “significant flaws” in this process.

Updated: 26 January 2024 By Becky Mosley

The UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) takes the ability for vulnerable gamblers to exclude themselves from online and land based casinos very seriously, as this has been proven by a £7.8 million penalty that has been charged to 888 after “significant flaws” in this process.

What happened?

The UKGC investigation found that due to a technical issue with 888’s systems, players who had opted for the site’s self-exclusion option were still able to play on 888’s bingo sites, despite being excluded from the casino, poker, and sports platforms.The issue went unnoticed for a significant period, meaning that those customers who were affected by the glitch could deposit a total of £3.5 million into their accounts after excluding themselves.888 Hit with £7.8 Million Fine After Self Exclusion Issues

Failure to Protect

Sarah Harrison, CEO of the UKGC, said of the ruling:“Safeguarding consumers is not optional. This penalty package of just under £8 million reflects the seriousness of 888’s failings to protect vulnerable customers.“The 888 sanction package will ensure those affected don’t lose out, that the operator pays the price for its failings via a sum that will go to tackling gambling-related harm, and that independent assurance will be given to see that lessons are learnt.”888 were also called out on their inability to spot and protect problem gambling, with one player having spent over £1 million, some of that having been stolen from their employer.The player gambled for approximately 3-4 hours per day, placing bets in large numbers, and the lack of interaction between 888 and this player was also flagged as a serious concern.£3.5 million of the fine will be used to reimburse the deposits by the self-excluded players, £62,000 will go to the company who had their money stolen, and the remaining funds will be given to a socially responsible cause dedicated to tackling gambling related harm.

Becky Mosley
Editor-in-Chief at Compare Casino Sites

Rebecca (Becky) Mosley has been at the heart of the UK online gambling industry since 2008 — making her one of the most experienced voices in casino comparison. She is editor-in-chief at Compare Casino Sites and personally oversees every casino review published here.

Becky brings a genuine player-first perspective to everything on CCS. Her approach has always been the same: transparency, fair bonus terms, and responsible gambling above all else. She insists on the same standards from every operator listed on the site — if a casino's terms can't stand up to plain-English scrutiny, it doesn't earn a recommendation.

Over 17 years in the industry, Becky has built deep expertise across UK Gambling Commission licensing, slot game mechanics, bonus structures, and the constantly evolving regulatory landscape. She works directly with operators and software providers to keep every listing accurate, and reviews each casino's wagering requirements, withdrawal limits, and customer support before a single rating goes live.

Becky is a Companies House registered director.