It is vital when offering online casino play, to also offer a way out for players who feel that they have developed a problem, and self-exclusion has always been the best way to do this.Self-exclusion offers players the opportunity to request a ban from online casinos so they are not able to play, something that an increasing amount of people are doing. However, this does have a knock-on effect on the casinos themselves, who are losing a large amount of revenues as a result of self-exclusion.
Loss of players
Hills is a casino that has announced that they are losing an average of 3,000 players a week to self-exclusion, which has a heavy effect on revenues.The effect of self-exclusion is taking its toll in the short term on online and land based casinos, but how can this issue be rectified?
Long term solution
The main used phrase by the most trusted and well-reputed casinos, both land based and online, is ‘responsible gambling’.It is understood that gambling responsibly is a positive for both players and casinos, and self-exclusion is a prime example of this fact.
Hills ran a poll to find out if self-exclusion was cause for concern for casino, and the results were unanimous. The results stated that it is always good for a player to accept that they have a serious problem with gambling, and exclusion or at least a cool off period is valuable for their recovery.The general consensus is that this will be nothing but positive for the gambling industry in the long run, even if the short term effects result in a loss of revenues.For further information on self exclusion and responsible gambling, please click here