Site of the month

SpinYoo Casino

SpinYoo Casino

100% First deposit bonus up to £250 + 100 bonus spins.  

Visit

18+. New players only. Min Dep £20. Max Bonus Bet £5. Offer: 100% of 1st deposit up to £250 + 100 Yoo Spins on Starburst, Book of Dead, Fire Joker, Gonzo's Quest, & Big Bass Bonanza respectively (first 20 credited on 1st deposit; rest credited at 07:00GMT at 20/day). Spins expire after 23:59GMT on day they’re credited. Winnings from each 20 spins capped at £50 & credited as bonus. Bonus funds expire after 30 days, are separate to Cash funds, & subject to 35x wagering of bonus + deposit amounts. Only bonus funds contribute to wagering requirements. Bonus funds can only be used on slots. Full Terms Apply. Play responsibly. BeGambleAware.org

Offer of the month

Casino Charles

Casino Charles

Register and deposit €25 for 250% bonus up to €1500  

Visit

Registrations and only for their first deposit. Upon depositing, you must select the "Welcome Casino Bonus" from the drop-down list. After that, the bonus will be awarded automatically to your account. Minimum deposit amount for this bonus is £25 Maximum given bonus is £1500 Welcome Casino Bonus can only be wagered on slots This Bonus cannot be used in conjunction with any other promotion. Bonus amount is subject to a wagering requirement of forty-five (45x) times. Full T&Cs apply.

MrQ Faces Regulatory Settlement Over Compliance Breaches

In a recent development, the United Kingdom Gambling Commission (UKGC) has reached a regulatory settlement with online bingo and iGaming operator, MrQ, owned by Lindar Media. The settlement of £690,947, comes in the wake of breaches related to anti-money laundering (AML) and social responsibility.The scrutiny of MrQ began after a compliance assessment was conducted by the UKGC in September 2022. The review unveiled several shortcomings in MrQ’s processes, particularly concerning money laundering prevention and safeguarding players from potential gambling-related harm. Lindar Media was found to have violated multiple Licence Conditions and Codes of Practice (LCCP), ranging from AML lapses to social responsibility oversights.

Specific Failings Highlighted

The Commission’s assessment pinpointed several areas of concern:AML Policies – Lindar Media’s AML policies, procedures, and controls were found lacking. The company’s practice of automatically assigning a “low” ML risk to new customers was criticised, as there was insufficient data to make such a determination. The financial thresholds set for ML were deemed too high, allowing customers to deposit and lose substantial amounts without triggering alerts.Social Responsibility – MrQ was found to have breached its obligations to interact with customers in a manner that minimises gambling-related harm. The company’s financial and safer gambling triggers were not always effective, especially for high-velocity depositors. The reliance on County Court judgements and bankruptcy data for assessing personal circumstances was also deemed ineffective.Advertising Lapses – Lindar Media came under fire for allowing its agents to use cartoon imagery in advertisements, which could appeal to children. Characters like Spiderman, King Kong, and Piggy Bank Bills were used in the ads. However, once Lindar became aware of the issue, corrective action was taken to remove the ads.

Lindar Media’s Response

In response to the regulatory settlement, Lindar Media acknowledged the breaches, attributing them to a period of rapid business growth. The company has since made strides in enhancing its safer gambling policies. Lindar Media’s CEO, Savvas Fellas, emphasised the company’s commitment to compliance and safer gambling, stating, “We’ve implemented scalable processes that provide consistency as we grow and built technology-driven models that underpin compliance and safer gambling promises to our players.”

A Year of Regulatory Actions

The Gambling Commission has been proactive in its regulatory actions throughout 2023. Earlier in the year, penalties were imposed on SkillOnNet and Kindred for AML and social responsibility breaches, amounting to £305,150 and £7.1m, respectively. William Hill also faced a significant penalty of £19.2m for a series of violations.

Leave a comment